Systemic Distortion LiP II  – Updates

 

LiP II is the evidentiary backbone: the documents, correspondence, and transcripts that show how systemic distortion was carried out — whether through incompetence, exploitation of the rules, or outright abuse, the effect was deliberate harm.

 

This record does not reproduce every document; it anchors them. The full evidence exists, preserved, and can be cross‑referenced if required. LiP I showed lived chronology; LiP II shows the evidentiary bundle that confirms it.

Index of Dossiers I–VI

  • Dossiers I–III → Anchor solicitor misconduct and CPR breaches — 28 distinct violations documented, rule by rule, showing how procedure was distorted and liability engineered.
  • Dossier IV → Captures collapse in the courtroom — bundle obstruction, barrister unbriefed, safeguarding ignored, and the devastating impact on Cub.
  • Dossier V → Shows avoidance dressed as procedure — strikeout celebrated, safeguarding disclosures silenced, aftermath reframed as claimant confusion.
  • Dossier VI → Exposes judicial containment — bankruptcy weaponised, substitution concealed, CCJ suppressed, oversight loops closing every gate.

Together → Not isolated failures but systemic distortion by design, reinforced at every level: solicitors, regulators, and judiciary. The CPR breaches are the forensic spine, but the lived harm and constitutional weight make the record unassailable.

 

Summary of Breaches (LiP II – VI)

  1. CPRs Misapplied & Misrepresentation — 28 distinct breaches across CPR 1, 3, 6, 16, 22, 31, 35, 40.11, and 44. Both solicitors misled the court, distorted procedure, and triggered wrongful payment. Evidence preserved across Dossiers I–III, unaddressed by regulators.
  2. Harassment Confirmed by Police — Safeguarding breach escalated into criminal conduct, obstructing ADR and exposing systemic failure to protect.
  3. Procedural Disclosure Failure — Bundle withheld, applications unserved, transcript confirms systemic disadvantage imposed on the claimant.
  4. Egress‑Only Obstruction — Secure system imposed without accessibility checks, denying parity and breaching equality of arms.
  5. Home Access Breach — Solicitor defied sealed Order, repackaged breach as video access, undermining inspection and safeguarding.
  6. CCJ Suppression & Enforcement Failure — £40,926 judgment unrecorded, shielding a bankrupt party from scrutiny and denying public protection.
  7. Expert Liability Distortion — CPR 35.6 misused to shift wrongful liability onto the claimant, undermining expert independence and evidentiary fairness.
  8. Representation Collapse — Claimant’s solicitor echoed Defence pressure, reframed compliance as concession, and abandoned safeguarding duties.
  9. Safeguarding Silence — Disclosure of Cub’s suicide attempt met with procedural retreat, safeguarding alerts ignored, harm compounded.
  10. December Reset Liability — Liability choreographed into certainty despite amendment order, procedural distortion renewed.
  11. Selective Remedy by Regulators — Harm acknowledged but remedies applied only to represented parties, Litigants in Person excluded.

Constitutional Breach — Failures reframed as breach of equal protection, transforming harm into constitutional evidence and sealing the record.

 

Actions were not incompetence.
They were systemic distortion.
Evidence preserved, remedy withheld.
Justice invoked, exclusion entrenched.

Naming Deferred, Not Denied


Names have been withheld for now, to preserve contradiction‑resistant framing.
But anonymity is not immunity.


Those who relied on silence will be the first named when the record moves from preservation to exposure.


Safety today does not guarantee safety tomorrow.
The braid is sealed, and when the archive speaks, it will speak in full.

 

 

Design & Copyright Owner Maureen Booth-Martin © All Rights Reserved

UA-54289644-1